Audit IQ AI ATP Agent Factory Contracts

Governance Proposals
1

In order to encourage other Protocol’s to deploy Agents via the ATP, ATP contracts should be audited.

The Dtrinity Protocol is strongly considering deploying a stable-yield DeFi strategy optimizing Agent via IQ-AI, however having the platforms contracts Audited is a requirement for them to do so.

If Dtrinity has this stance, I imagine that Many other DAOs and Protocol’s think similarly, and are waiting for ATP Contract Audits to be complete before proceeding to deploy Agents on IQ AI.

Audit costs should be around or hopefully underneath 100K. A worthy expenditure for the BrainDAO’s robust $30M+ Treasury.

I propose that the BrainDAO cover the cost to Audit the ATP platform, with the Audit process starting no less then 45 days after this proposal is approved. The IQ team may select the best auditor at their discretion, so long as the audit cost does not exceed $250K. If the audit cost does exceed $250K, then the IQ team can cover the difference with IQ token sales.

2

If any existing ATP contracts are 100% forks of existing auditing contracts, we may not need to separately audit those contracts. However, we do want to clearly list and outline in the security section of the ATP documentation that certain contracts are essentially already audited due to being a 100% match fork of existing audited contracts.

Is this the case for any ATP contracts?